Google’s Shift to 4 Ads on Top

Google recently announced that they are dropping text ads from the right sidebar of desktop search results which is currently live worldwide across and its search partners.

As part of this change Google has aggressively started ramping up the number of ads showing at the top of their main search results from 3 to 4 ads for what they deem “higly commercial queries.” Early estimates in a recent study from Dr. Pete Meyers at Moz put the number of search queries with 4 ads up to as much as 36%.

What does this mean for SEO?

The 4th paid ad position is the new position 1 in natural search. Natural search results are continuing to be pushed “below the fold” at a much higher rate. Expect that natural search visits and click through rate could decline as a result. The degree of the change depends on what percentage of ad adverse consumers continue to scroll directly to the unpaid natural search ads.

What does this mean for Paid Search? 

The maximum number of paid ads in search results will be declining from 11 possible ads to only 7. At the same time these 7 ads will be in much more prominent, premium positions. There are a number of theories as to how this will impact paid search as a channel, but the most likely scenario is that over the long term it will drive up competition and increase cost per click rates. The right side rail ads, once seens as a way to get a bargain buy will no longer be available, leading all bidders to duke it out over the 4 positions on top and 3 positions below the main search results.

There is alot of discussion about this change within the industry as with any update like this there is alot of misinformation and hysteria. Ultimately this is a change that will have an impact on the overall mix to natural and paid search. In order to best adapt, I recommend waiting a few weeks until you have a good sample of data and then doing a close analysis of the performance of both channels and develop a strategy  to adapt to the environment and make it work for  you and your organization. On the paid side alot of companies are keeping their bids in place in the short term, so it could be a while before any changes to paid search costs are apparent, but we expect that the SEO impact will be apparent earlier.

Google Search Layout Change


HTTPS and SEO. Should you make the Switch?

With Google’s recent announcement regarding HTTPS becoming a ranking signal we are getting lots of questions from clients on whether they should consider making the move towards deploying SSL across their entire web property. http

While there is no question that broader adoption of HTTPS is a win for consumers and the continued push towards stronger privacy protection it’s connection to SEO is less straight forward.

Use of HTTPS is likely to be a minor natural search ranking factor for quite a while given the wealth of valuable content that will continue to live on unsecured domains due to the complexity and cost of deploying SSL certificates for publishers. Google has even acknowledged this in stating that this change will only effect 1% of global queries.

Whenever Google announces anything that may increase rankings the tendency is to jump to execute as soon as possible. It is important to weigh the benefit vs. the actual cost and level of effort of rolling it out within your IT group.

If you are thinking of moving to HTTPS primarily for SEO reasons, We would ask that you revisit the top 5 actions you could take on your site today to improve SEO performance and consider going after these much larger opportunities before revisiting the HTTPS question. A major move forward on your content strategy or in fixing notable technical SEO issues on your site will have much greater payoffs than the latest fad of the moment.

Mobile App Indexing and SEO

As native app usage continues to surge on smartphones more information seeking and product purchase is taking place within mobile apps than ever before.

Mobile App Indexing in Google

Image Credit: Google

As you can imagine Google is very aware of this trend and is looking to do for mobile apps what they did for traditional websites in making deeper in-app content searchable directly from within their mobile search results.

What does this mean for SEO? 

Mobile App indexing is an emerging opportunity to better engage with existing users of your mobile app by allowing them to open deeper app content when conducting related searches directly from Google mobile search. A couple examples of where this would be particularly valuable is when users have their payment method saved within your app or if you offer a mobile app but do not have a strong mobile website or don’t have one at all.

How to Get Your App Indexed by Google 

Getting your mobile app indexed is done through a process called “deep linking” which includes:

    1. Selecting where in your app you’d like users to access via mobile search and specify intent filters in your app manifest.
    2. Including links to your app within your XML sitemap or by placing app links in the rel=”alternate” attribute of corresponding pages on your main website in the <head> section.

Google currently only supports the indexing of mobile apps for Android devices, but I’d expect them to be exploring rolling out support for iOS devices in the very near future.

We Have Mobile! Now What?

In Forrester’s latest Mobile Trends for Marketers report, analysts Thomas Husson and Julie Ask see 2013 as the year forward thinking digital marketers shift from saying “We have mobile” to saying “Mobile helps differentiate ourselves from the competition.”

Our clients have seen notable mobile device adoption growth for their target audience across the board. Given this continued trend we work with them closely to deploy innovative approaches to serve their mobile users as they interact with search engines and continue to grow their mobile search traffic and revenue. mobile-search

As your organization evolves to a more innovative approach to mobile SEO, here are a few key questions to ask throughout your company and the vendors and consultants you work with.

  • Do you have a clear understanding of the differences in search behavior on your site from visitors accessing your site on mobile devices and are actively building mobile landing pages to search best serve these consumers?
  • If your organization has not built a mobile experience for your site have you analyzed how many visitors are coming to your regular site on mobile devices and leaving immediately out of frustration?
  • Are you analyzing the differences between smartphone and tablet based search queries getting to your site and building separate experiences to best serve consumers different needs?
  • Is your web presence devalued in search engines due to duplicate content issues from serving experiences at different URLs while not implementing the critical SEO coding requirements?
  • Have you done any analysis to understand the differences in your natural search rankings for the keywords most critical to your business for desktop/laptop searches vs. those same terms on mobile and tablet devices?

For more information on general mobile trends be sure to check out Forrester’s excellent 2013 Mobile Trends for Marketers

My SES Chicago 2012 Presentation

SES Chicago 2012 conferenceI recently had the privilege of speaking at Search Engine Strategies Chicago last month on the panel “Integrated Search, Social and Display for Ecommerce Sites” discussing how companies can better measure performance across digital marketing channels and to more effectively collaborate across channels to maximize SEO opportunities and improve performance of all digital channels.

As companys’ digital marketing programs become more complex and categories more competitive, ensuring proper cross channel attribution in web analytics and ensuring regular data and insight sharing across channels will become increasingly important.

See full presentation Integrated Search, Social and Display for Ecommerce

Featured in SEO Ranking Factors Article

I was recently featured in an article from the folks over at Orbit Media Solutions

Check it out here: Social Media, Branding and AuthorRank: Are they SEO ranking factors

Video: WordPress & Web Analytics Presentation at Depaul University

Here is the link to the full video of my presentation on WordPress and Web Analytics at Depaul University in Chicago, IL

See my presentation at Wordcamp Chicago 2011 here

Wordcamp Chicago 2011 Presentation

I recently had the honor of speaking at the 2011 Wordcamp Chicago Conference (Chicago’s annual conference dedicated to the open source blogging/cms platform WordPress where I spoke on using web analytics with WordPress.

The WordPress community is such a great group of people and the 3rd annual conference was yet another success. Thanks to Mary Duquaine, Heather Acton, Becky Davis, Mert Sahinoglu along with all the other speakers and volunteers for putting on a great event.

For anyone interested here are the slides from my presentation

Are you providing value or further polluting the web?

You may have sensed it for years now or just recently realized it but natural search engine results are slowly becoming cesspools of low quality information and noise.

Google in particular has been getting a lot of negative press lately about the quality of their search results and more people are becoming increasingly frustrated. As a result Google is revisiting the two biggest problems plaguing their search algorithm currently:

  1. linking schemes
  2. content farms

To those who are publishers/webmasters of sites or those who work in SEO, can you honestly say you feel the work you do is adding value and making the web a better place or are you one of the people responsible for polluting it?

The primary goal of search engines (commercial motivations aside) is to provide visitors with the best, most valuable information corresponding to their search queries.

Are you working to provide great content and user experiences targeted to relevant search queries or are you only manipulating search engine algorithms into thinking your content is something it is not?

Are you part of the solution or part of the problem?